Caught up in deadly arms race

By K N Pandita

Never before has the world seen its denizens making a bigger effort of self-destruction than what we are witnessing today. Powerful advanced nations have always sought to manufacture more and more lethal weapons to be used on land or sea or in the air. The smaller nations that are economically far behind the superpowers are also trying to fill their arsenals with as many sophisticated weapons as they can.

Superpowers raise the bogey of threat from their rivals to justify a race for advanced or what is technically called next-generation arms. But in reality, they are doing so to garner markets for new tech war machines and thus boost their economies and sustain the standard of life they have provided to their citizens. Consequently, scientists and technocrats are in great demand to use their innovative potential and manufacture more and more destructive weapons. The arms race has become as acute as to profile nothing less than the angel of death.

The triangular rivalry involving the US, China and Russia is the first circuit of international rivalry seeking arms supremacy, and hence they constitute the first grid of the arms race. All three countries are working tirelessly towards innovation in the manufacturing of warplanes, long-range and supersonic missiles and powerful naval strike forces; weapons of mass destruction apart.

They have also identified the regions of the globe likely to be converted into battlegrounds. For more than a century and a half Central Asian region remained at the centre of the British and the Czarist political rivalry, which resurged in the cold era phase in a new form. Czarism re-surfaced in its new avatar of Marxism-Leninism, and British imperialism gradually surrendered its colonial aspirations to the rising sun of American capitalism.

The rather surprising happening of the contemporary world is the sudden rise of the opium-eater nation of China to the heights of superpower, economically and militarily, so much so that while Russia has sought her friendship, the United States is considering her a serious challenge to its world-dominating status. For some time in the recent past Sino-American economic rivalry has taken the world markets by surprise as China is widening them for its goods globally.

The fallout of the tripartite rivalry has resulted in the second grid of arms race among the satellite nations of the three superpowers. Developed or developing democratic countries in the Asian Continent such as Australia, Japan, South Korea and India, all having a stake in the IOR, Indo-Pacific and the South China Sea have thrown their lot with the United States. The pretension of the Quad-4 that the organization aims at boosting trade and technological partnership is only a cover. Quad-4 is a naval alliance to neutralize the Chinese aggressive posture in the Indo-Pacific and the IOR. Maximum international trade passes through the Strait of Malacca and the Indo-Pacific nations want to ensure that China does not impose its hegemony on the strategic water channel.

Side by side the Quad-4 another military alliance called Aukus has come up. The UK, US and Australia have announced a historic security pact in the Asia-Pacific, in what is seen as an effort to counter China. It will let Australia build nuclear-powered submarines for the first time, using technology provided by the US. The August pact, which will also cover Artificial Intelligence and other technologies, is one of the countries’ biggest defence partnerships in decades, analysts say.

China has condemned the agreement as “extremely irresponsible”. China’s embassy in Washington accused the countries of a “Cold War mentality and ideological prejudice”.

China has sponsored a parallel Quad-4 type of organization led by non-democratic or pseudo-democratic countries like Pakistan, Turkey and Iran under the leadership of China. A closer look at these formulations shows that the Chinese Quad-4 is not necessarily formulated for either lending military strength to China or defending their respective authoritative political dispensation at home. The participating members have their national and political interests. Pakistan does not want Indian naval power to have a say in the control of the waterways of the Indian Ocean. Turkey has been aspiring for replacing Saudi Arabia as the epicentre of the Islamic world, something for which Pakistan, too, nurtures hidden ambition.

Russia does not tolerate the US playing a leading role in the Indian Ocean region because of its interests in the Middle East and the African States. Regarding the Afghan Taliban, Russia has adopted a conciliatory attitude to keep both Iran and Pakistan in a happy mood. Though the Central Asian Republics, especially Uzbekistan and Tajikistan, do not see eye to eye with Moscow for its Taliban policy, nevertheless, it appears Moscow has convinced the Taliban leadership that it should not allow its land to be used for subversive activities against the CARs.

An important factor that comes into play in this multi-faceted political and strategic rivalry is the role of Israel. For a long time, the existence of the State of Israel on what the Arabs call Islamic land has been a source of acrimony between the Arabs and the Israelis as well as the Iranians and the Israelis. With time, and through astute diplomacy of the Jewish lobby in the US Congress, relations between Israel and the Arab world have left behind an era of dire acrimony. Saudi Arabia has not, for a long time, taken any step that would cause damage to her relations with Israel. Only recently relations between the UAE and Israel have been officially endorsed and the two sides are planning to widen the scope of the relationship further. This has upset Iran, a country that wants to tell the world that she is more Islamic than the Arabs by expressing hatred and dislike for the Jews in fulfilment of the Quranic injunctions.

The UAE as well as the Saudi kingdom are apprehensive of Iran going nuclear. They have had a role in getting the anti-nuclear deal of 2015 scuttled during the Trump administration. Assuming that Iran has its way in manufacturing the dirty bomb the UAE, understandably, has mended fences with Israel in the hope of obtaining an anti-nuclear shield through the good offices of Israel.

Although Iran nuclear deal was scuttled by President Trump and sanctions re-imposed on Iran, the decision has not gone well with the European Union because Iran is a major supplier of oil. The imposition of sanctions on Iran has caused difficulties to oil-importing countries including India and this has been an irritant in the US-Iran-India triangular relations. Iran has been unhappy with India going slow with the Chabahar port project and this became the catalyst for China to jump into the fray and carve a foothold for herself in Iran. China is now eyeing Afghanistan’s untouched mineral wealth especially her copper ore reserves.

In this messy situation where misunderstanding and suspicion abound, big powers find it unavoidable to depend on their military power to resolve issues and security interests. China has supplied the newly built world’s largest and strongest warship to Pakistan. India has begun to receive an S-400 anti-missile shield from Russia which has annoyed the US. It may be that the US takes some punitive measures.

But the crucial aspect of the arms race is not as significant between the smaller or developing countries as between the superpowers. The race for superior air power means manufacturing much more lethal combat planes. This may be understood from the neck to neck race between the US and Russia in reinforcing their air arsenal with the fifth-generation combat aircraft.

Russia showcased fifth-generation combat aircraft at the Dubai Airshow earlier last month. Besides the Middle East, Moscow is looking to market the Sukhoi-built warplane to India, Vietnam, and African countries.

The UAE has a $ 23 billion agreement with the US to procure Lockheed Martin stealth fighters and other weaponry. The promise of 50 F-35 Lightning II aircraft is a major chunk of this deal. But the US has put a condition that the finalization of the contract is dependent on Abu Dhabi’s involvement in the Yemen conflict. The US is evaluating the impact of this deal on Israel, a key customer of F-35 jets. According to US legislation of 2008, Washington is to assist Israel in maintaining its Qualitative Military Edge (QME). Israel desires superior military systems capable of defeating any credible existential threat to her.

Biden administration has reflected concerns about the UAE’s military dealings with China. It wants the Gulf state to terminate its 5G contract with controversial Chinese technology firm Huawei, which has been accused of corporate espionage by the US and seen as a security threat.

In this confusing situation, reports are that Abu Dhabi is interested in Russia’s Su-75. This was confirmed by a senior Russian technocrat at the Dubai Airshow 2021 adding that UAE’s representative would go in for a single-engine Su-75 Checkmate light tactical fighter of Sukhoi make. At the 2017 UAE defence show IDEX, Moscow had declared that the Russian company Rostec would co-develop a fifth-generation light combat fighter with Abu Dhabi. The Russian technocrat added, “We foresee that maybe in five years, we have the unmanned version of Checkmate controlled by artificial intelligence,”

India has been looking for Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft (AMCA) for nearly two decades. PAK FA, the project that developed the Su-57 fighter, was originally supposed to involve India and Russia. This was to be called the Fifth-Generation Fighter Aircraft (FGFA). However, in 2018, India decided to pull out of the project owing to the Indian Air Force’s reported concerns regarding the stealth features and engines of the Su-57. Perhaps the IAF also factored in India’s indigenous projects currently in development, including the single-engine HAL Tejas Mark-2, also called Medium Weight Fighter (MWF). In an interview with the Hindustan Times, the former Indian Air Force Chief Bhadauria had said that IAF was keen on the integration of sixth-generation technologies into the AMCA. Currently, the Checkmate does not seem to have enough time to be ready to compete for the IAF’s requirement to buy 114 combat aircraft.

Thus we find that in an atmosphere of cutthroat competition based on advanced technology and consequent costs involved, there is a race among the superpowers to manufacture more and more lethal weapons and also find markets for them. India, still in need to arm her with highly sophisticated weaponry, must perforce make a choice and strike a deal. She may think of three choices before her regarding stealth combat aircraft which are Su-75 of Russia (an advanced version of Su-57), F-35 of the US make or the indigenous HAL Tejas Mark-2.

Afghan Crisis and Regional Strategy: A Hindsight

By K N Pandita

The withdrawal of the American and NATO troops from Afghanistan on 15 August 2021 was more ignominious than the departure of the Soviet troops from their Afghan incursion in 1991. The latter had impacted the regional strategy while the former dealt a frontal blow to the ideology of democracy having an edge over modern totalitarianism. Continue Reading…

Taliban outreach, a myth or reality

By K N Pandita

Taliban have often reiterated their policy of Taliban fighters not fighting in a foreign land. How come the rumour of the Taliban possible outreach to Kashmir has been receiving media hype? Taliban outreach is a craving Pakistan has been nursing. Continue Reading…

Will the AUKUS alliance eclipse the Quad?

By K N Pandita

The trilateral alliance among Australia, UK and the US (AUKUS), recently announced by President Biden from the White House, has given rise to two controversies. One is whether it undervalues and supersedes the Quad-4 that is presumed to be an important feature in the security dynamics of the Indo-Pacific region. Continue Reading…

Afghan scenario in terms of history

By K N Pandita

China and Pakistan have joined hands to uproot the semblance of Westminster type of democracy from the Asian continent. That is what has happened in Afghanistan.

The Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan has re-emerged after fighting the invading forces for two decades. Now we have three Islamic republics in the region namely Iran, Pakistan and Afghanistan. All of them express their allegiance to sharia law meaning the law that has been derived from two sources, the holy book (Qur’an) and the tradition (hadith). Continue Reading…

Why overstate Taliban takeover in Kabul

By K N Pandit

Because of the covert and overt help of Pakistan, and the US’ blurred vision of Afghan policy, the Afghan Taliban are walking the streets of Kabul without a stiff battle. The Americans are gone. The “elected” government of Ashraf Ghani is gone and the Afghan national army raised by the Americans with great fanfare is invisible – destroyed, absconding or deserted. Continue Reading…

India will handle the Taliban with tactful strength

By K N Pandita

Pakistan is euphoric about the victory of the Taliban and the fall of Kabul. It is her fulfilment of the four-decades-old desire of achieving strategic depth westward. This country has been feeling nervous about the vulnerability of her eastern border after the loss of Bangladesh in the 1972 war with India. What added to her anxiety was the growing cordial relationship between India and Afghanistan. Why Muslim Afghanistan developed a cordial relationship with the infidel India and did not warm up with her has remained an unresolved enigma for the rulers of Pakistan. Continue Reading…

India enters its 75th year of independence

By K N Pandita

Westminster model democracy takes a long time to strike its roots deep in the psyche of the people. The British democracy is more than a millennia, and the American democracy is nearly 250 years old. The survival of democracy, as we glean from the example of the two countries mentioned above, depends on how pragmatic these are with the inbuilt capacity of adjusting with a new imperative that appears rapidly in an age of scientific and technological advancement. Continue Reading…

Iran: problems after the change of regime

By K N Pandita

The Problem

On August 5, Ebrahim Raisi, the President-elect of Iran took formal oath of office and thus replace the somewhat moderate predecessor Hassan Rouhani. His election for the top position in Iran is a shot in the arms of the conservative clergy since Raisi is known and the diehard Islamist very close to the patriarch Ayatollah Khamenei. To some commentators he is the most likely leader to succeed the patriarch when he is no more. What are the national problems looking into his eyes and how is he likely to react? This is what we intend to discuss here. Continue Reading…

Iran at a crossroads: emerging scenarios

By K N Pandita

Stating the issue

On May 8, 2018, President Trump announced that the US was withdrawing from the JCPOA and signing a presidential memorandum to institute the “highest level” of economic sanctions on Iran. In a statement, Secretary of the then Treasury Steve Mnuchin stated that sanctions would be re-imposed subject to certain 90 days and 180 days “wind-down periods.” Reacting angrily, Iran said that since the US had rescinded the nuclear deal unilaterally, she was not bound to honour the agreement. Continue Reading…

Taliban spill over to Central Asia: Exit the US enter Russia

By K N Pandita

The Minister of External Affairs, S Jaishankar was right in saying that India wanted peace in and around Afghanistan. As Taliban are reported to be taking control over more and more towns and border crossing points, the neighbouring states, Pakistan, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, India, China and Russia, all are closely watching how the situation is developing in strife-torn Afghanistan after the exit of the US and NATO forces. Continue Reading…

New weapons in Pak’s jihad arsenal

By K N Pandita

The Hindustan Times of 1 Dec 2020 published alarming news. It said: “Pakistan’s ISI, inspired by the success of using cheap drones to carry out small bomb attacks, has been exploring this option for terrorist groups. The ISI had laid out its plan first at a meeting with senior Lashkar-e-Tayyaba and Jaish-e-Mohammed commanders in Punjab province’s Texila in April this year. Continue Reading…

Gaza de-escalation: the tenuous ceasefire

By K N Pandita

At the special session called by the Security Council to discuss the fighting in Gaza, the Pakistani foreign minister strove every nerve to project it a global Islamic issue and tried to invoke the Muslim countries to consider the Israeli attack nothing short of “genocide of Palestinian Muslims.”. He was more vocal than any other delegate and boasted that the “united effort had brought about the desired pressure on Israel to accept a ceasefire.” Continue Reading…

Pandemic, opposition and the blame game

By K N Pandita

In a situation of the pandemic, when the entire nation is in the throes of existential threat, it expects a true and disinterested democratic opposition to sweep aside political and other differences for the time being, and offer full support to the government in meeting the deadly challenge. Criticising the government for where or how it has faltered is all right, but more than criticism, the situation demands honest and pragmatic suggestions and practical involvement in saving the nation. Continue Reading…

The US’ pull out in Afghanistan: What are the implications?

By K N Pandita

In the later phase of his administration, former President Trump had expressed his desire of sending the American troops “back home for Christmas”. The Doha conference of 2020, arranged after much legwork was done silently by the diplomats, showed that his intention was genuine. There had been some re-thinking among the US planners that continuing the two-decade-old war in Afghanistan has a reduced priority in the wake of changing political alignments on a global level. Continue Reading…

The intricate deal of Chahbahar port

By K N Pandita

At a time when India, after a temporary halt, resumed and accelerated work at Chabahar seaport in the Gulf of Oman, the Iranian Foreign Minister gave an intriguing statement that made observers raise an eyebrow. Speaking to the audience at an event in Raisina Dialogue 2021 in the second week of April, Javad Zarif said, ” We have made very clear to our Indian, Chinese friends that Chabahar is open for cooperation for everybody. It is not against China …. is not against Gwadar…..” Continue Reading…

Whose baby is the Tehreek-i-Labbaik?

By K.N. Pandita

The anarchy and bedlam let loose by the extremist right-wing party Tehreek-i-Labbaik Pakistan (TLP) in Lahore and other major cities in Pakistan is the reward deservingly offered to the politicians of Pakistan. It is a stunning example of Frankenstein. Continue Reading…

Are we heading towards ‘Asian NATO’?

By K N Pandita

The Quad is an offspring of the US’ Indo-Pacific security, under contemplation for quite some time at various levels of the US think-tanks. The perception received a boost during the Trump administration when relations between Washington and Beijing soured. Continue Reading…

Pakistani peacenik warriors: Changing strategy not heart

By K.N. Pandita

General Bajwa says India and Pakistan must live in peace and dialogue is the only way. In recent months this is the third time he has spoken of peace in the region. It sounds bizarre. The army that initiated three wars with India with the fourth an ongoing proxy war believing that it has to inflict a thousand cuts on the body of India, wants to abandon war and seeks peace. Is this posture real or fake? Continue Reading…

Sub-continent in the grip of disquiet

By K N Pandita

Three countries of the Indian sub-continent – India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan – are bogged with grim disquiet whose roots lie in the exclusivist beliefs of the Islamic State of Pakistan. After actively stoking the embers of Theo-fascism for more than three decades, the deep State finds that at the end of the day the flames are engulfing it. Continue Reading…